Quote Cart

View your shopping cart.

Newsletters of Sustainable Lighting

Another thought on light comparison: FLUORESCENT vs. LED

Another thought on light comparison: FLUORESCENT vs. LED

Is it time to take stock? Should the lighting industry take a step back and take a more detailed look at the lighting phenomenon from the electronics industry that is the light emitting diode?

LEDs have all the key elements of a ‘sustainable’ lighting product. Low energy consumption relative to light output and long life when compared with traditional light sources. Sure, there’s a price to pay for these attributes, but the sustainability argument looks to be won.

Prerequisites for performance

Before we compare two installations – one fluorescent and one LED – it is worth noting why LEDs are such expensive lighting products. There are a couple of prerequisites to ensure good light quality and ef cient performance from an LED.

  • The quality of the chip and the lens system must be high
  • The junction temperature must be managed, usually with a built-in heatsink
  • The electronics must be independently tested

The above elements define the quality and performance of an LED.

On the other hand, with a fluorescent luminaire there are also a number of fundamental elements that ensure quality and performance.

  • Lamp – branded, with published operating criteria
  • Control gear
  • Reflector – light output ratio must be at least 70

Consider sustainability

So let us review two installations – one LED and one fluorescent – with sustainability in mind.

In simple terms the fluorescent installation is governed by lamp life. If a lamp fails, it can be replaced without any signi cant disruption to the installation. Not only that, the failed lamp can be recycled through a registered scheme and the sustainability cycle has been completed.

When comparing LED and fluorescent light sources, operating life is a key consideration. The longevity of a fluorescent source can be expressed in terms of ‘average rated life’ with known service parameters, but the lives of LED sources are far more difficult to pin down, despite LM70 and LM80 tests.

Even if the control gear fails it can be replaced as part of a maintenance regime and the redundant control gear recycled through a registered scheme. If an LED downlight fails, however, the picture is a little different.

The LED downlight will have to be removed from the ceiling and replaced with another downlight.

This process is more disruptive and expensive than simply replacing a fluorescent lamp. It may even involve the purchase of a new LED before any warranty process can be enacted.

Disposal of the LED

As well as the replacement cost there is the little matter of the new LED downlight – probably more than 10 times the price of a fluorescent lamp – and the disposal of the failed LED. The disposal will have to be far more sophisticated than traditional methods to ensure the sustainability cycle is closed.

The key question is: ‘Are there systems to recycle failed LEDs that are genuinely sustainable?’ And how will this affect the carbon footprint of the LED product? Perhaps a more important question is:

‘Have any of the LED manufacturers calculated the carbon impact of these new lamps and luminaires and the recycling processes?’

LED has been promoted as the technology for use at high level, because of the life and operational durability claims that have been made for them. I am not suggesting that LED is not viable for this or indeed any other efficient projects.

The cost of over-promotion

But perhaps a word of caution before – as with many previous lighting innovations – the lighting industry over-promotes LED technology as something it is not, then pays the price.

I can already hear those LED manufacturers that are making interchangeable LED modules arguing that interchangeability is the answer. Well, that argument may have some substance, but if the electronics fail the LED module will not operate.

There are of course other LED configurations – remote drivers and LED lamps, for example.

Ironically, the LED retrofit lamp, not popular with some purists, is probably the most successful in terms of sustainability because it can be easily replaced and causes no more disruption than a traditional light source.

However, even the LED retrofit lamp market has an Achilles heel. As LED technology continues to evolve at a spectacular rate, redundant stock builds up.

A 3W GU10 has been superseded by a 4W then a 6W and so on. The major manufacturers can write down the redundant stock, but is this really a picture of sustainability?

led bulbs

Thanks for sharing such a informative information with us, Its really helpful for me.

Self Test LED Emergency

Self Test LED Emergency Downlight

Leds will become a main part of the lighting industry. You can find them everywhere from traffic lights to flashlights. LED lighting comprise an important and growing segment of the lighting industry.

There comes a LED downlight, which is an advanced emergency light, 3 hour rated, non-maintained luminaire.  Cost effective  Self test  Maintained or non maintained  3hrs back up

For more information about REASHINE’s products visit

Another thought on light comparison: FLUORESCENT vs. LED |


Another thought on light comparison: FLUORESCENT vs. LED |

A typical 3 button setup makes use of the 1 or 3 button for a neighborhood hood gate opener.

Another thought on light comparison: FLUORESCENT vs. LED |

Hi there friends, how is the whole thing, and what you desire to say concerning this post, in my view its genuinely amazing in favor of me.

Another thought on light comparison: FLUORESCENT vs. LED |

- Measurements appareil (HxLxP) : 31x37x21cm.

Another thought on light comparison: FLUORESCENT vs. LED |

Undeniably believe that which you stated. Your favorite justification appeared to be on the web the easiest thing to be aware of. I say to you, I definitely get annoyed while people consider worries that they just don't know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top and defined out the whole thing without having side effect , people can take a signal. Will probably be back to get more. Thanks

Another thought on light comparison: FLUORESCENT vs. LED |

Debido а alto peligro ԛue impllica estɑ operatoria, es frecuente ԛue loos préstamos personales tengan սna elevada tasa Ԁe interés.

Another thought on light comparison: FLUORESCENT vs. LED |

Fantastic goods from you, man. I've understand your stuff previous to and you're just extremely excellent. I actually like what you have acquired here, really like what you're saying and the way in which you say it. You make it entertaining and you still take care of to keep it smart. I cant wait to read much more from you. This is really a tremendous website.

Another thought on light comparison: FLUORESCENT vs. LED |

Good day I am so delighted I found your blog page, I really found you by error, while I was researching on Digg for something else, Regardless I am here now and would just like to say thanks for a remarkable post and a all round exciting blog (I also love the theme/design), I don't have time to go through it all at the moment but I have saved it and also included your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read a lot more, Please do keep up the fantastic job.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <strong> <em> <p>

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.
Technilux Lighting
  • Address Unit 18, 41-49 Norcal Road,
  • Nunawading, Victoria, Australia
  • ABN 69 065 653 885
  • Telephone +61 03-9872-7688
  • Fax +61 03-9874-8299
Technilux Lighting Partners Technilux Lighting Partners Technilux Lighting Partners Technilux Lighting Partners Technilux Lighting Partners Technilux Lighting Partners